THE GUARDIAN — TECH·JUNE 3, 2026
Labour MP sues Elon Musk’s xAI company over fake sexualised images
VERIFIED FACTS
- 01Jess Asato, Labour MP for Lowestoft, filed a legal claim in London's high court against xAI over Grok-generated images
- 02Asato said Grok produced images portraying her wearing a bikini without consent and a video 'showing her being chloroformed and prepared for a sexual assault'
- 03Asato's legal claim alleges xAI breached laws connected to data protection and misuse of private information by allowing users to prompt Grok to create such images
- 04Ashley St Clair filed a similar lawsuit in New York state, alleging explicit images were generated of her by Grok, including an image in which she was underage
- 05The UK government threatened action against X in January after Grok was used to produce sexualised imagery based on real women and children
- 06Ofcom launched an inquiry into the issue
- 07X initially said it would restrict such imagery to paying customers, then announced it had entirely stopped Grok from editing pictures of real people into revealing clothes
- 08Keir Starmer condemned X's initial restriction to paying customers as 'horrific'
- 09Grok falsely accused two Hampshire police officers, including Christi Hill (a 12-year constable), of involvement in the arrest of Henry Nowak, leading Hill to flee to a safe location
- 10Numerous posts on X called for the wrongly identified officers to be tracked down, arrested, or face violence
LOADED LANGUAGE DETECTED IN ORIGINAL
violatinghorrificfar-right causeswrongly identified
These words or phrases carry political, emotional, or ideological loading in the original article. Use Link Launderer to see them highlighted in context.
SUMMARY
Labour MP Jess Asato filed a legal claim against Elon Musk's xAI company alleging its Grok tool was used to generate non-consensual sexualised images of her, including images of her in a bikini and a video depicting assault. The case follows similar action by Ashley St Clair and comes after the UK government threatened action against X in January when Grok produced large quantities of such imagery. X initially restricted the feature to paying users before disabling Grok's ability to edit real people's images entirely.